# Signalling proposal - Change/Reduce Secret gas fee tiering

**URL:** <https://forum.scrt.network/t/signalling-proposal-change-reduce-secret-gas-fee-tiering/7185>\
**Category:** Secret Governance\
**Created:** [November 28, 2023, 9:19am UTC](https://forum.scrt.network/t/signalling-proposal-change-reduce-secret-gas-fee-tiering/7185 "2023-11-28T09:19:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ertemann](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forum.scrt.network/ertemann/32/3688_2.png) [@ertemann](https://forum.scrt.network/u/ertemann)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2023, 9:19am UTC](https://forum.scrt.network/t/signalling-proposal-change-reduce-secret-gas-fee-tiering/7185/1 "2023-11-28T09:19:59Z")

</div>

This proposal is intended to signal a change of the accepted gas fees by Secret validators.

simultaneously it can be seen as a signalling proposal to change the not yet implemented min-mingas fee parameter to 0.05uSCRT.

Please follow past conversation about this topic here: [Proposal for Implementing an on-chain Minimum Gas Fee of 0.1 uscrt - #11 by antonymous](https://forum.scrt.network/t/proposal-for-implementing-an-on-chain-minimum-gas-fee-of-0-1-uscrt/7008/11)

Proposed fee tiers:  
Low: 0.05 uSCRT  
Med: 0.1 uSCRT (2x lower option)  
high: 0.25 uSCRT (2.5x lower option)

\*\*please see this as a potential last interim change before Secret moves to SDK v0.47+ and can thereby use ABCI++ and the Skip block SDK to make fees usage/demand dependent.

Best,  
Ertemann  
**Lavender.Five Nodes**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![antonymous](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forum.scrt.network/antonymous/32/4153_2.png) [@antonymous](https://forum.scrt.network/u/antonymous)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2023, 9:30am UTC](https://forum.scrt.network/t/signalling-proposal-change-reduce-secret-gas-fee-tiering/7185/2 "2023-11-28T09:30:42Z")

</div>

I am not in the business of running a validator and I do not have the numbers in front of me, so I do not know how this will change the validator bottom line, but as mentioned - easy yes from a client/user perspective.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ertemann](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forum.scrt.network/ertemann/32/3688_2.png) [@ertemann](https://forum.scrt.network/u/ertemann)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2023, 9:35am UTC](https://forum.scrt.network/t/signalling-proposal-change-reduce-secret-gas-fee-tiering/7185/3 "2023-11-28T09:35:43Z")

</div>

It has no significant impact on validator bottomline, like pennies a day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ertemann](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forum.scrt.network/ertemann/32/3688_2.png) [@ertemann](https://forum.scrt.network/u/ertemann)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2023, 12:14pm UTC](https://forum.scrt.network/t/signalling-proposal-change-reduce-secret-gas-fee-tiering/7185/4 "2023-12-04T12:14:04Z")

</div>

This is a last call for feedback!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SecretSkrillah](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forum.scrt.network/secretskrillah/32/4002_2.png) [@SecretSkrillah](https://forum.scrt.network/u/SecretSkrillah)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2023, 12:18pm UTC](https://forum.scrt.network/t/signalling-proposal-change-reduce-secret-gas-fee-tiering/7185/5 "2023-12-04T12:18:56Z")

</div>

> [@ertemann](#):
>
> \*\*please see this as a potential last interim change before Secret moves to SDK v0.47+ and can thereby use ABCI++ and the Skip block SDK to make fees usage/demand dependent.

When is this planned for amigo? I don’t see it in the dev roadmap

> **[2024 Secret Network Development Roadmap | Secret Network Blog](https://scrt.network/blog/roadmap-2024)**
>
> Introducing a brand new development roadmap for Secret Network