Incentivizing the use of SEFIs

Not sure what are the concrete plans out there, but thought I’d throw this out.

(1) Buy-and-burn mechanism. For every swap taking place, Fees = 0.35%. 0.05% of the fees will be used to buy SEFI and burn it.
(2) Holding SEFI gets bonuses on swapping fees. For instance, base swap fees = 0.3%. Holding a% of the total SEFi in circulation gets you a mini discount of (1-a/Total amount in circulation) of 0.3%.
(3) Lending and Earning APY bonuses.



Not sure about the other ones, but I’m not that big of a fan of buy and burn. I don’t think it really adds anything to the ecosystem apart from trying to pump the coin a bit. Developers need to spend time on creating and testing something like that which doesn’t really have any long term function apart from price speculation.

The other ideas I think could definitely be looked into.

I’m more into a profit sharing scheme just for simplicity’s sake.

PS sorry if I seem negative in any way. I think it’s great that you’re creating dialogue for this!


For discussion’s sake, don’t worry, I am not taking offense at it. I think at least we’re having open discussion and for others to chime in.

I don’t see it as “price speculation” nor “pumping the price”. SEFI has a max cap of 1 billion, which is great (unlike cosmos-based blockchains which are inflationary in nature). I agree that it should have a long term value. Now, long term value could be in the form of bonuses (some examples which I have listed above) or even in the form of price appreciation. Unlike equities, which the companies deliver ROIs (e.g. through their business making or rental income), SEFI has to deliver returns to its holders, no?


Agreed. I think governance does bring a lot of long term value but would also like to see a profit sharing scheme.

I’m a bit weary of tied in utility as I’ve seen the headache it has caused trying to balance the price of their token to their card tier scheme.

1 Like

@Iowascero Can you share the roadmap of SecretSwap?


@maleficarum I think that part of the problem is that $SEFI doesn’t have an identity. Ever since it’s launch, it’s been in a tailspin and I think that’s partly because with all the options for investing, why invest in a coin that isn’t well defined? Other than the announcements that $SEFI was coming and is here I could only find its github that had any information about it. And this information is outdated and none of the links work.

I would like to see incentives for holding $SEFI too but I think that first it needs an identity with a clear purpose. I don’t think that just the idea of it is cutting it.


1 Like


I agree. That is why we are discussing here. Let’s help to provide more ideas!

Sure. I think an obvious place to start would be to give $SEFI at least it’s own page. Describe why the token was developed and a give a roadmap to its development. Explain how it’s different from $SCRT and why it’s needed. Once people have clear reasons to hold $SEFI, then we can work on incentivizing them to do so.

Basically, I think we should work on giving $SEFI a strong identity and then add incentives instead of the other way around. Does that make sense?

1 Like

@SecretedAway totally agree!

@Iowascero what do you think?

This thread has went silent. We hoping for inputs from the Commitee lead or dev team lead.

I’m hoping these posts get more community engagement before I weigh in too heavily. Keep in mind, per my charter, I am to be supportive of governance efforts but I shouldn’t exert direct influence on these efforts. The SecretSwap Committee is not a governance committee & I don’t think the community would appreciate it behaving as such. Have you tried circulating links to these discussions in the relevant Telegram & Discord channels and asking for engagement?

As far as the roadmap goes, per my discussion with Can of Enigma, governance and buyback are accounted for. Beyond that, the process of determining direction will become significantly more decentralized and we won’t know what the community decides until governance is implemented and they discuss and decide it. Governance (which will be implemented by the end of June) & discussions just like these are key. I’ve shared your threads in a few places and will continue to do so over the next few days to stoke the fires a bit.

1 Like

Thanks for raising this.

  1. Burning tokens generally doesn’t add any value apart from giving a better perspective on PR / marketing’s end. This is a great article you can refer to :

I would suggest perhaps we can do both buyback to distribute and buyback to burn. This is what likely will happen once buyback mechanism is being implemented:

1.Staking rewards & trading fee rewards increase (resulting from buyback)> 2. SEFI token value increases > 3. SEFI token awareness increases > 4. Protocol awareness increases > 5. Trading volume increases / more liquidity is being attracted> 6. Trading fees increase > Back to 1

I personally think that a greater % of the fees should allocate to buyback at least in the first year since most of the SEFI rewards are given to LPs. Moreover, higher APYs for providing liquidity that results from higher SEFI price is definitely more sustainable than providing LPs with inflationary rewards.

Out of the current 0.3% of fees allocated to LPs, I’m in favour of moderating it to 0.15% to LPs, 0.1% to buyback and distribute and 0.05% to buyback and burn. FYI Decentralised trading protocols such as WooTrade and Perpetual Protocol are allocating 50% of their fees to buybacks too.

  1. and 3) look good to me.

The uses of SEFI should and must extend beyond 3-4 use cases. Governance is one of them. The more genuine use cases, the greater the value proposition of SEFI.

Use case 4:
Holding a tiered amount of SEFI allows access to more functionalities. For instance
Tier 0: 0 SEFI
Tier 1: 10k-50k SEFI
Tier 2: 50k-150k SEFI
Tier 3: … and so on
Tier 10 as max

Tier 10 opens access to every single functions, whereas Tier 9 will open access to 90% of the functions (with the last 10% of functions being the most exclusive and the highest rewards). Some instance of functions include fund-raising/seed investments or exclusive deals in curated companies.

This would be similar to other projects, but the key difference is privacy.

1 Like

Tbf the use cases of SEFI are limitless.

Another thing that is good to have will be the longer the SEFI token is staked on governance, the more voting power it has. We should reward believers and HODLers but not whales who speculate. This will also incentivise more folks to HODL. Afaik Curve Finance is one of the very few protocols that’s currently implementing this mechanism.

Some other uses of SEFIs (consolidating people’s inputs)
(5) Locked SEFI staking (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months): Locking your SEFI provides the following benefits - (i) Increased Governance vote power (longer you lock, more power) by a %, (ii) Increased APY returns (stated earlier), (iii) Provide bonus to 𝕊ecret Bridge for Earn rates on the assets - also allow the Earn assets to be locked in.

SEFI-SSCRT to be the only LP with bonus incentives. Fees on this pool to be higher than fees on the other pool (e.g. 0.4% compared to 0.3% for other pools). This has the effect (not sure if desirable or undesirable of highly correlating SEFI prices to SCRT prices) - would this be good or bad? Please discuss.

we at have added one use case for SEFI, as the only means to participate in our ICO. 1 SEFI = 3 BUTT!

Let me know if you have any questions.

@stevenchang5000 What doess buttcoin do?

It will be used for governance, profit sharing and utility.

Can you please elaborate on that? @stevenchang5000