# (Dev discussion/Issue) WASM implementation

**URL:** <https://forum.scrt.network/t/dev-discussion-issue-wasm-implementation/1303>\
**Category:** Secret Network\
**Created:** [February 20, 2020, 5:22pm UTC](https://forum.scrt.network/t/dev-discussion-issue-wasm-implementation/1303 "2020-02-20T17:22:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ainsley](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forum.scrt.network/ainsley/32/73_2.png) [@ainsley](https://forum.scrt.network/u/ainsley)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2020, 5:58pm UTC](https://forum.scrt.network/t/dev-discussion-issue-wasm-implementation/1303/6 "2020-02-20T17:58:59Z")

</div>

Curious to hear @reuven’s thoughts on the tradeoffs. We want to help people re-use code they’ve already worked on… but I suspect if there are elements that are easier (i.e., a built-in analogue for msg.sender ) we would get some fans for change :). Not sure if something like that is within scope of this choice or not.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.scrt.network/t/dev-discussion-issue-wasm-implementation/1303)._